Aladdin Central Messageboard :: Post a reply
Aladdin Central Messageboard
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Aladdin Central Messageboard Forum Index
->
Disney
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Guest post code
Who is the main character of "Aladdin"?
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Husse"]Oh sure, ME submissive. :lol:[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Aladdin
----------------
Aladdin
News & Updates
Fan Works
The Marketplace
The Skull and Dagger
About the Site
----------------
Site Feedback
Miscellaneous
----------------
Disney
Miscellaneous
Topic review
Author
Message
persian85033
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:36 pm
Post subject:
Well, Jasmine is definitely not like that.
If she was she would have married one of those hateful suitors and tried to change him. VERY unlikely, at least from what I saw with Achmed.
AladdinsGenie
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:24 am
Post subject:
There might be a difference between "Belle" and "Beauty" from the original story.
I know there's a huge glaring difference between "Jasmine" and the princess in Aladdin whose name changes depending upon what version you have
. The one in the book was a robot
Husse
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:22 am
Post subject:
Oh, please. Belle was not the least bit submissive.
APK
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:46 pm
Post subject:
What a load of ********!
Hey
Why did the censors block that out? I only said proposterous nonsense.
Well, I still don't agree with a lot the article said. I'm not a big fan of Cinderella but I think most little girls love those stories because they like the idea of magic and princesses. Plus, the books usually come with pretty pictures.
When I was a kid, I liked Cinderella because she was nice to animals
But now I prefer princesses like Jasmine, who make it their life's ambition to scare men into submission.
Meesh
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 12:17 pm
Post subject:
I know, but in the original fairytale itself, that's not the case.
Nez
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:37 pm
Post subject:
Meesh wrote:
I can definitely understand the BatB one.
I don't know.
The scene where Belle is nursing Beast's wounds kinda show her not taking any of Beast's sh---.
Meesh
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 2:16 pm
Post subject:
Jasmine is awesome, and Disney made her headstrong and yeah.
I can definitely understand the BatB one.
Husse
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:32 pm
Post subject:
Yup. Ask my chump mother.
Heh heh, Hello, Mom.
Jas
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 3:00 pm
Post subject:
Husse wrote:
Oh sure, ME submissive.
NOT!!!!!!!!!
Husse
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:53 pm
Post subject:
Oh sure, ME submissive.
AladdinFan
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Fairy tales linked to abusive relationships
AladdinsGenie wrote:
It's a good thing Jasmine takes no sh*t from anyone, or else I might be messed up too
You got that right. Thats what maks her better than most disney "heroines". I'm glad that people are begining to see the stupidy of cinderella and snow white and other films involving weak man desperate so-called heroines.
Calluna
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:32 pm
Post subject:
This reminds me very much of a certain old Aladdin fan I know.
Anyway, I guess it depends on what part of the stories they related to.
AladdinsGenie
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:13 pm
Post subject: Fairy tales linked to abusive relationships
I think this might go under the miscellaneous category since it's not exactly Aladdin related or Disney, but I found this very funny:
Yahoonews.com wrote:
LONDON (AFP) - Young girls who enjoy classic romantic fairy tales like "Cinderella" and "Beauty and the Beast" are at greater risk of becoming victims of violent relationships in later life, a British researcher says.
A study of both parents of primary school children and women who have been involved in domestic abuse claims than those who grew up reading fairy tales are likely to be more submissive as adults.
Susan Darker-Smith, a graduate student who wrote the academic paper, said she found many abuse victims identified with characters in famous children's literature and claimed the stories provide "templates" of dominated women.
A more senior academic at the University of Derby said the topic was sure to spark debate but merited further research.
"They believe if their love is strong enough they can change their partner's behaviour," Darker-Smith said. "Girls who have listened to such stories as children tend to become more submissive in their future relationships."
The research, conducted in Leicester in the east of England, is to be presented to the International Congress of Cognitive Therapy in Gothenburg, Sweden, next month.
Her study, entitled "The Tales We Tell Our Children: Overconditioning of Girls to Expect Partners to Change", will be discussed by many of the world's most influential therapists.
Darker-Smith said she believed younger generations exposed to television and other entertainment media may react differently and be less submissive than those weaned solely on literature.
Her work found the most popular bedtime stories for girls were "Cinderella" and "Rapunzel", while boys were more likely to hanker for "Paddington Bear" or "Thomas the Tank Engine".
Darker-Smith, a masters student in cognitive behavioural psychotherapy at the University of Derby, will also submit other abstracts to the conference, examining ideas about anorexia and post-traumatic stress disorder.
Michael Townend, senior lecturer in psychotherapy at the university said: "We know that storytelling is an important way that children form beliefs about themselves and relationships."
"Susan's work is an interesting study which is sure to spark debate, but further research is required in this area."
It's a good thing Jasmine takes no sh*t from anyone, or else I might be messed up too
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2002 phpBB Group